Blockchain firm Paystand secures millions of dollars in investment


Daniel Webber
Daniel Webber
Founder & CEO
Daniel is Founder and CEO of FXcompared and has 18 years of experience in the international finance world focusing on cross-border payments, technology and the property sectors. Daniel is widely… Read more
  • Firm manages to secure around $20m as part of an investment drive from various investors, including DNX Ventures and Epic Ventures, in a funding round
  • The firm focuses on improving blockchain payments between businesses 
  • “We have pioneered assurity-as-a-service, which is our view of [what] the scaled commercial blockchain looks like”, says leading figure at Paystand

American blockchain-based payments platform, Paystand, has managed to secure a significant sum of investment capital in a funding round. 

The online money transfer company got cash from a range of investors. 

It is believed that the total amount it has secured is close to $20m. 

The firm is believed to intend to spend it to accelerate the expansion of its products and services. 

This is the second time that the California-based firm has managed to secure an investment round. 

This round comes from a very diverse range of sources, including well-known names on the VC scene such as DNX Ventures and Epic Ventures.

Other firms like Battery Ventures, Commerce Ventures and Wildcat Ventures are also represented in the funding round. 

Paystand caters to commercial clients and works to make payments simpler and easier for corporate organisations. 

It is understood that the newly boosted firm has a blockchain which implements both public and private aspects, and that it is compatible with a whole range of currencies from around the world. 

According to the firm’s Chief Executive Jeremy Almond, the company’s offer could be accurately compared to “Venmo for complicated transactions for commerce”.

Almond, who was speaking to website VentureBeat, was referring to the consumer service Venmo which is owned by PayPal. 

“It’s like Venmo for complicated transactions for commerce”, he was quoted as saying. 

“We are rebooting the financial infrastructure because a lot of it was built pre-internet. It holds companies back. We’re coming in with a new business model, doing payments-as-a-service.”

He also went into detail about the firm’s approach to proportional charges.

“A lot of folks charge 2% to 3% as a fee for moving money”, he said. 

“In commerce, that’s a huge chunk. You can’t do that. Our model does not penalize companies for success. Blockchain for us is an enabling infrastructure, like the cloud was two decades ago. Blockchain is the infrastructure of the future.”

Further on in the extensive interview, Almond began to describe how his firm offered what he called “assurity-as-a-service”. 

“We enable the infrastructure between companies to use what they call smart contracts”, he said.

“We pay you on these terms. How do you ensure that happens? Blockchain infrastructure is good for that kind of thing.” 

“We have pioneered assurity-as-a-service, which is our view of [what] the scaled commercial blockchain looks like”, he added.

The international money transfer world might be fast-moving, but that doesn’t mean you can’t source the latest information. Keep an eye out on our news pages to keep up to date. 

Most Read

Use Our Currency Comparison Tool

Select country...

Select country...


Editor's Choice is an fx money comparison site for international money transfer and to compare rates from currency brokers for sending money abroad. The website and the information provided is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer, solicitation or advice on any financial service or transaction. None of the information presented is intended to form the basis for any investment decision, and no specific recommendations are intended.  FXC Group Ltd and FX Compared Ltd does not provide any guarantees of any data from third parties listed on this website. FX compared Ltd expressly disclaims any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from (i) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (ii) any action resulting therefrom.