Travel payments data reveals interesting insights

|

Daniel Webber
Daniel Webber
Founder & CEO
Daniel is Founder and CEO and has 20 years of experience in the international finance world focusing on cross-border payments, technology and the property sectors. Daniel is widely quoted as an expert… Read more
  • Amadeus finds that modes for mobile payments in China are ever-increasing, with regions like Latin America slipping back
  • China also described as having the largest business to consumer e-commerce sector in the world
  • “This data highlights how quickly the payments landscape is changing and the increasing complexity facing travel merchants”, says senior Amadeus figure

A newly-released piece of research into the payment behaviour of travellers has been released.

The report, from travel technology business Amadeus, said that alternative methods for cross-border payments were popular – especially in Asia, where 58% of those travelling chose payment modes that weren’t cash, such as e-wallets.

A total of 58% of Asian travellers choose to use an e-wallet option or, alternatively, bank transfer. Only 42% opted for cash, which is seen as the traditional method of payment for travellers, or bank card.

In Europe, meanwhile, the so-called alternative methods of e-wallet or bank transfer was the mode of choice for 53% of travellers.

Surprisingly, Africa came in as the third most popular region for non-cash travel spending, with almost half, a total of 49%, of travellers there using electronic methods.

A total of 38% of travellers in the Middle East and North America did so, while the region with the lowest uptake of alternative travel payment formats was Latin America which saw just 19%.

Asia also clinched another top spot in the data. China was named as having the world’s largest volume of business to consumer e-commerce, at $1.03 billion.

E-wallets are now believed to have doubled in popularity compared to bank cards in the country. This is in part due to the popularity and performance of Alipay, a major household name in the country.

In total, Chinese e-wallets are responsible for almost half (or 49%) of China’s digitalised spending on tourism and travel.

The report did, however, highlight some geographical areas in which the e-wallet revolution around online money transfers has not taken off.

In the Philippines, for example, cash was still highly popular, with 47% of consumers said that they would rather make payments with this method of payment.

In Malaysia, bank transfers were named the top form of transfer. 47% of people use this method in the country, making it the highest in the Asia Pacific region.

According to an Amadeus representative, the figures show that the payments landscape is “changing” due to “increasing complexity”.

“This data highlights how quickly the payments landscape is changing and the increasing complexity facing travel merchants”, said Bart Tompkins, Managing Director for Payments at Amadeus.

“It should be noted that despite less travellers paying with cards directly, many e-Wallets do rely on the card networks in the background. So, cards will continue to be essential payments infrastructure for our industry”, he added.

If you would like to learn more about how consumers in various verticals including travel are paying for their goods and services, why not head over to our news pages and learn more?


Most Read

Use Our Currency Comparison Tool

Results are ranked in order of the best overall deal, taking into account transfer times, rates, fees, and customer service.

Editor's Choice

FXcompared.com is an fx money comparison site for international money transfer and to compare rates from currency brokers for sending money abroad. The website and the information provided is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer, solicitation or advice on any financial service or transaction. None of the information presented is intended to form the basis for any investment decision, and no specific recommendations are intended.  FXC Group Ltd and FX Compared Ltd does not provide any guarantees of any data from third parties listed on this website. FX compared Ltd expressly disclaims any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from (i) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (ii) any action resulting therefrom.