Ant Group files for IPO to boost payments capacity

|

Valentina Vitali
Valentina Vitali
Research Analyst
Valentina is a Research Analyst and passionate about payments and fintech. Valentin enjoys analysing money transfer companies and the market. In her work, Valentina analyses payments data… Read more
  • Ant Group, which is linked to the Chinese e-commerce company Alibaba, said that it would list its shares on both the Hong Kong and Shanghai exchanges.
  • It will build on its current online money transfer capabilities when it gets the cash from the IPO, and it will also boost its capacity for research.
  • The decision to file an IPO comes against a backdrop of significant geopolitical question marks, including the role of the Chinese government and its relationship with the US.

A Chinese firm associated with the e-commerce giant Alibaba has announced that it will list its shares on two major global stock exchanges.

Ant Group said that it would use the gains from the move to boost its international money transfers business.

It intends to put its shares on two major East Asian stock exchanges – one in Shanghai and another in Hong Kong.

The firm could end up valued at tens of billions of US dollars if the initial public offering (IPO) goes ahead.

From there, it could be valued well above US$225bn.

The firm said that it would provide extended online money transfer capacities with the cash it expects to raise.

It also says that it will invest heavily in research and development.

It publicised this information in a filing ahead of the IPO’s launch.

The move comes against a geopolitical backdrop that has held the interest of market watchers for years.

Earlier this year, the firm – along with another Chinese firm, Tencent – was told that it would face an investigation.

China’s central bank, which is an organ of the country’s government, is understood to be angry that the two conglomerates have significant power over the online money transfer market in China.

This fact was referenced in the IPO prospectus produced for the benefit of potential new shareholders who want to invest in the firm.

According to one press report, the prospectus in fact references this potential problem.

It claims that the Chinese government is taking steps designed to reduce the role of monopolies in the Chinese financial system.

Payments, it claims, have been just one part of a growing anti-monopoly perspective on the part of the Chinese government.

Insurance, lending and other financial avenues have also been affected, it claimed.

More broadly, the move could also contribute to the difficult trading and diplomatic environment between China and the US.

The US government under President Donald Trump has demonstrated its willingness to impose sanctions of various types on China, especially in relation to technology.

The firm again demonstrated that it was aware of this risk by highlighting it in its communications.

It said that the international money transfer services it offered could be at particular risk if US sanctions were to continue.

Are you looking for a new cross-border payments provider? We’ve written up reviews covering a wide range of providers, and you can find them here.


Most Read

Use Our Currency Comparison Tool

Results are ranked in order of the best overall deal, taking into account transfer times, rates, fees, and customer service.

Editor's Choice

FXcompared.com is an fx money comparison site for international money transfer and to compare rates from currency brokers for sending money abroad. The website and the information provided is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer, solicitation or advice on any financial service or transaction. None of the information presented is intended to form the basis for any investment decision, and no specific recommendations are intended.  FXC Group Ltd and FX Compared Ltd does not provide any guarantees of any data from third parties listed on this website. FX compared Ltd expressly disclaims any and all responsibility for any direct or consequential loss or damage of any kind whatsoever arising directly or indirectly from (i) any error, omission or inaccuracy in any such information or (ii) any action resulting therefrom.